For Immediate Release

Ottawa, ON (unceded Anishinabe Algonquin Territory) – Prisoners’ Legal Services (PLS) is thrilled by the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Canada (Attorney General) v. Power, which confirms that governments aren’t protected from compensating people when they violate Charter rights by passing unconstitutional laws. The majority in this decision confirmed that Charter damages may be available when a law is clearly unconstitutional, enacted in bad faith, or an abuse of power.

This case concerned legislation that retroactively made certain people, including Mr. Power, permanently ineligible for a criminal record suspension (a pardon). Courts decided that these laws violated the Charter. Mr. Power then applied for Charter damages for the breach of his rights caused by these laws. The majority of the Supreme Court confirmed that Mr. Power could apply for Charter damages in this case.

PLS intervened at the Supreme Court, and argued that giving law makers absolute immunity from Charter damages for passing unconstitutional laws would reduce access to justice for incarcerated people and would leave them without meaningful remedies when their constitutional rights are violated.

Alexa Biscaro, of Counsel at Norton Rose Fulbright, says: “This is a critical decision that reaffirms the rule of law in Canada and the supremacy of the Canadian Charter. Ensuring that legislatures can be held to account for enacting clearly unconstitutional laws, or doing so in bad faith or through an abuse of power, brings us one step closer to the full recognition and protection of the rights of people in prison.”

Jessica Magonet, staff lawyer for PLS, says: “People in prison are frequently harmed by laws that violate the Charter, including the administrative segregation law, which authorized prolonged solitary confinement. We are very excited by the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Power case, which will help ensure that incarcerated people can be compensated for the harms caused by unconstitutional laws.”

PLS was represented in this matter by Alexa Biscaro and Sarah Ivany of Norton Rose Fulbright Canada.